Pragmatic versus syntactic approaches to training deductive reasoning.
نویسندگان
چکیده
and Abstract Plus Examples Conditions In this study we are interested in how people interpret and reason about a very important type of logical statement, called the condirional. Even though conditional statements are really very simple, people often make errors in dealing with them. These instructions are intended to help you understand conditional statements. Read through these instructions carefully; they should help you solve some reasoning problems you will receive afterward. A conditional statement consists of two component statements which are often joined by the conjunctions “if. then.” The conditional statement can be expressed in the standard form.
منابع مشابه
Interaction of reasoning ability and training intervention in reaction to training evaluation and post training effectiveness.
It has been shown that learners' abilities interact with the type of training intervention and effect on training and its outcomes. For this reason, the current research investigated the interaction of reasoning ability with two training methods, namely deductive and empirical methods, in effect on reaction to training evaluation and post training effectiveness. This research was an applied an...
متن کاملInteraction of reasoning ability and training intervention in reaction to training evaluation and post training effectiveness.
It has been shown that learners' abilities interact with the type of training intervention and effect on training and its outcomes. For this reason, the current research investigated the interaction of reasoning ability with two training methods, namely deductive and empirical methods, in effect on reaction to training evaluation and post training effectiveness. This research was an applied an...
متن کاملPragmatic reasoning schemas.
We propose that people typically reason about realistic situations using neither content-free syntactic inference rules nor representations of specific experiences. Rather, people reason using knowledge structures that we term pragmatic reasoning schemas, which are generalized sets of rules defined in relation to classes of goals. Three experiments examined the impact of a “permission schema” o...
متن کاملPractical versus Pragmatic: Enlarging the Selection Task, extending reasoning
In the selection task, individuals generally do not follow the deductive rules of standard logic. In the present research, a new abstract selection task was designed by extending the range of cards that the participants face (inspired by Manktelow, Sutherland and Over, 1995). It was used in two experiments to test predictions about the matching bias and the probabilistic approach of reasoning. ...
متن کاملTreebank Development with Deductive and Abductive Explanation-based Learning: Exploratory Experiments
In pace with the success of corpus-based approaches to theoretical and computational linguistics, the collocation of corpora has evolved into a research activity in its own. As the currently available corpora either lack annotation depth or closure, more data will be annotated in the future, preferably with minimal human intervention. This paper tries to approach the problem of treebank develop...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Cognitive psychology
دوره 18 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1986